There was widespread disagreement among Federal Open Market Committee participants at the June 16-17 meeting, minutes of that meeting released Wednesday showed.
At the meeting, the FOMC held rates steady, as expected, but drastically reduced the size of its statement to remove forward guidance. The updated Summary of Economic Projections shows a shift toward rate hikes due to sharply higher inflation expectations.
All participants support leaving the policy rate unchanged at the meeting due to elevated inflation, solid expansion of economic activity and stable labor market conditions.
"Participants generally assessed that information received over the intermeeting period suggested that upside risks to price stability remained elevated while downside risks to achieving maximum employment had moderated a bit," the minutes showed. "A few participants commented that, in light of these developments, there was a case for raising the target range for the federal funds rate, but those participants indicated that they supported maintaining the current target range at this meeting."
However, there were disagreements about the future path of policy and what could trigger certain actions.
"Most participants remarked on scenarios in which inflationary pressures would dissipate and inflation would soon begin to return to 2%," the minutes showed. "In such scenarios, almost all of these participants noted that it would likely be appropriate to maintain or eventually lower the target range for the federal funds rate."
However, some noted that outcomes such as stable labor market conditions combined with elevated inflation due to AI-related demand, further conflict in the Middle East and tariffs could result in policy tightening to bring inflation back to the 2% level.
Many participants said that they expect the federal funds rate to be below the current level by the end of the year, while "many other" participants anticipate the federal funds rate to move higher over the same period.
The minutes show that a majority of participants supported shortening the post-meeting statement and removing language that suggested a bias toward policy easing that had been seen in previous statements.