FINWIRES · TerminalLIVE
FINWIRES

China's June Private Sector Growth Moderates as Services Activity Softens, RatingDog Survey Shows

By
China's June Private Sector Growth Moderates as Services Activity Softens, RatingDog Survey Shows

Overall business activity across China's private sector expanded at a slightly softer pace in June, with the headline RatingDog China Composite Output Index falling to 53.6 from 54 in May.

The index, compiled by S&P Global and published Friday, deviated from the official government composite PMI released by the National Bureau of Statistics, which edged up to 50.6 from 50.5 the previous month.

The RatingDog China General Services Business Activity Index slipped slightly to 54.1 from 54.4 in May, according to the same S&P survey on Friday. In comparison, the official state non-manufacturing PMI barely rose from the neutral line, coming in at 50.2 in June from 50.1 in May.

S&P survey respondents attributed higher services activity to increased new businesses, stronger client demand, acquisition of new clients and more project developments. The survey also indicated that cost pressures eased since May.

New business volumes increased in June amid a boost in demand, including in international markets, which prompted firms to hire more manpower. Employment rose to its strongest level since July 2024

Services exports grew to its quickest rate since October 2024.

On the manufacturing side, factory activity slowed to a three-month low, with the RatingDog China General Manufacturing PMI sliding to 51.7 in June from 51.8 in May as new order growth eased, according to earlier data.

This still outperformed the official government manufacturing PMI, which returned to growth at 50.3 from a flat 50.0 in May.

"Total new business increased for the forty-second consecutive month, with growth decelerating slightly while remaining at a firm level, supported by domestic demand," RatingDog founder Yao Yu said.

"A notable positive signal came from external demand, as new export business expanded at the fastest pace so far this year, reinforcing the trend of improvement in overseas orders."

In a June 30 note, ING's chief economist for Greater China, Lynn Song, said policy support should be strengthened as domestic retail demand experiences volatility.

"It seems increasingly clear that the domestic demand engine of growth is sputtering, and further policy support would be beneficial and help avoid an increasingly unbalanced growth profile," Song said.

Related Articles

Australia's Perpetual Turns Down AU$2.45 Billion EQT Buyout Bid
US Markets

Australia's Perpetual Turns Down AU$2.45 Billion EQT Buyout Bid

Australian investment fund Perpetual (ASX:PPT) has turned down a takeover approach from Swedish private equity firm EQT AB, saying the proposal undervalued the financial services company, according to a Wednesday press release.Under the proposal, EQT-controlled Windflower Pte Limited offered to acquire all of Perpetual's shares for AU$21.64 apiece in cash, valuing the company at about AU$2.45 billion."The indicative proposal was highly conditional and did not adequately represent fair value for Perpetual shareholders in the context of a change of control transaction," the company said in a statement.The approach comes after Perpetual terminated an AU$2.2 billion deal with private equity firm KKR in 2025 to sell its wealth management and corporate trust businesses.The transaction was scrapped after an independent expert concluded it was not in the best interests of shareholders following an adverse tax ruling.Perpetual said it would instead pursue a separate sale of its wealth management business.The investment manager subsequently agreed to sell its wealth management business to Bain Capital for an upfront cash payment of AU$500 million, with additional performance-linked payments of up to AU$50 million.The company said the proceeds would be used to reduce debt and support growth in its asset management and corporate trust businesses.The latest proposal adds to a string of takeover attempts for the investment manager.Perpetual rejected an AU$1.7 billion bid from a consortium that included Regal Partners in 2022, before turning down an AU$3.1 billion offer from its largest shareholder, Washington H. Soul Pattinson, the following year.

ASX:PPT
Update: Alibaba, US Payments Partner to Pay $600 Million in Drug-Import Probe
US Markets

Update: Alibaba, US Payments Partner to Pay $600 Million in Drug-Import Probe

(Updates to remove the seeking comment line in the 9th paragraph, as Alibaba has since responded)Alibaba Group (HKG:9988) and its US payments processor, AUS Merchant Services, agreed to pay a combined $600 million to resolve an investigation by the US Justice Department into illegal pharmaceutical sales on the company's e-commerce platforms.The Chinese tech and e-commerce firm admitted that between January 2016 and December 2024, it failed to prevent roughly 80,000 product sales on Alibaba.com and AliExpress.com that involved unlawful imports of pharmaceuticals, controlled substances, listed chemicals and pill presses, according to a Wednesday notice from the Justice Department.In a statement issued to, Alibaba described the settlement as a "mutually satisfactory resolution with U.S. regulators.""This settlement reflects a thorough regulatory process with Alibaba's full cooperation and our commitment to best-in-class standards of control, policies, and measures against non-compliant product sales."The products involved in the investigation have a combined gross merchandise value exceeding $200 million, the DOJ said, adding that federal agents made more than 40 undercover purchases of illegal drugs and counterfeiting equipment during the probe.Separately, AUS admitted that from January 2020 to December 2023, it accepted US dollar-denominated wire and credit-card payments on behalf of overseas Alibaba merchants.Under a non-prosecution agreement, Alibaba will pay a $125 million criminal penalty and forfeit $200 million, while AUS, formerly known as Alipay US, will pay an $85 million penalty and forfeit $190 million.First Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles C. Calenda for the District of Rhode Island called it "the largest monetary settlement in the history of the District of Rhode Island."Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department's Civil Division, said, "Companies operating online marketplaces - whether based in the United States or abroad - must implement appropriate safeguards to prevent bad actors from exploiting their platforms. If they fail to do so, the Department will hold them accountable."The settlement marks the latest US action against Alibaba after the US Department of Defense in June added the company to its list of "Chinese military companies" under Section 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act, alongside Baidu (HKG:9888), BYD (HKG:1211, SHE:002594), Nio (HKG:9866), WuXi AppTec (HKG:2359, SHA:603259), Robosense Technology (HKG:2498) and more.Last week, Alibaba sued the Pentagon, seeking to overturn the designation and accusing the department of acting without factual basis or fair process in branding it as a threat to national security."The determinations have no basis in fact or law... To label Alibaba a 'Chinese military company' is to brand it an instrument of the Chinese military and a threat to US national security," Alibaba wrote.

HKG:9988
Alibaba, US Payments Partner to Pay $600 Million in Drug-Import Probe
US Markets

Alibaba, US Payments Partner to Pay $600 Million in Drug-Import Probe

Alibaba Group (HKG:9988) and its US payments processor, AUS Merchant Services, agreed to pay a combined $600 million to resolve an investigation by the US Justice Department into illegal pharmaceutical sales on the company's e-commerce platforms.The Chinese tech and e-commerce firm admitted that between January 2016 and December 2024, it failed to prevent roughly 80,000 product sales on Alibaba.com and AliExpress.com that involved unlawful imports of pharmaceuticals, controlled substances, listed chemicals and pill presses, according to a Wednesday notice from the Justice Department.In a statement issued to, Alibaba described the settlement as a "mutually satisfactory resolution with U.S. regulators.""This settlement reflects a thorough regulatory process with Alibaba's full cooperation and our commitment to best-in-class standards of control, policies, and measures against non-compliant product sales."The products involved in the investigation have a combined gross merchandise value exceeding $200 million, the DOJ said, adding that federal agents made more than 40 undercover purchases of illegal drugs and counterfeiting equipment during the probe.Separately, AUS admitted that from January 2020 to December 2023, it accepted US dollar-denominated wire and credit-card payments on behalf of overseas Alibaba merchants.Under a non-prosecution agreement, Alibaba will pay a $125 million criminal penalty and forfeit $200 million, while AUS, formerly known as Alipay US, will pay an $85 million penalty and forfeit $190 million.First Assistant U.S. Attorney Charles C. Calenda for the District of Rhode Island called it "the largest monetary settlement in the history of the District of Rhode Island."Alibaba did not immediately respond to' request for comment.Assistant Attorney General Brett A. Shumate of the Justice Department's Civil Division, said, "Companies operating online marketplaces - whether based in the United States or abroad - must implement appropriate safeguards to prevent bad actors from exploiting their platforms. If they fail to do so, the Department will hold them accountable."The settlement marks the latest US action against Alibaba after the US Department of Defense in June added the company to its list of "Chinese military companies" under Section 1260H of the National Defense Authorization Act, alongside Baidu (HKG:9888), BYD (HKG:1211, SHE:002594), Nio (HKG:9866), WuXi AppTec (HKG:2359, SHA:603259), Robosense Technology (HKG:2498) and more.Last week, Alibaba sued the Pentagon, seeking to overturn the designation and accusing the department of acting without factual basis or fair process in branding it as a threat to national security."The determinations have no basis in fact or law... To label Alibaba a 'Chinese military company' is to brand it an instrument of the Chinese military and a threat to US national security," Alibaba wrote.

HKG:9988