FINWIRES · TerminalLIVE
FINWIRES

From 9/11 To Hormuz Stranglehold: Events Reshaping Global Energy Markets This Century

By

Global energy markets over the past quarter-century have been defined by a series of shocks, including geopolitical conflicts, financial crises, technological breakthroughs, and policy shifts that have fundamentally redrawn supply chains and pricing dynamics. Iran is the latest episode in the series.

Here are the most pivotal events of the past two decades that have left a lasting imprint on global oil and gas markets.

Dot-Com Bubble:

When the tech bubble peaked in March 2000 and went into a free fall in the immediate aftermath at the turn of the century, it hit economic activity across the globe, and the energy markets were no exception.

Crude oil prices dropped from $30 to the mid-$20s, according to data compiled by the US Energy Information Administration.

This entire episode highlights how quickly macro slowdowns can weigh on oil and gas markets, with demand-side shocks proving just as impactful as supply disruptions.

9/11 & The Middle Eastern Wars:

Following in quick succession were the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, which initially triggered a sharp drop in energy prices as global travel and economic activities came to a standstill.

However, this didn't last long, as the ensuing US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan embedded a lasting geopolitical premium to oil and gas prices. Supply concerns in the Middle East became a constant feature, keeping prices elevated for much of the early 2000s.

Brent futures rose from the mid-$20s in the early 2000s to as high as $140s per barrel in 2008, amid the growing risk premium tied to uncertainties in the Middle East.

Enron Bankruptcy:

The year 2001 also involved the bankruptcy of commodities trading giant Enron in December, exposing the deep flaws, off-balance sheet financing, and high levels of leverage involved in the global energy trade.

At the time, Enron was a dominant player in US natural gas and electricity trading, acting as a key intermediary in price discovery. Its sudden bankruptcy led to a sharp contraction in liquidity, as market participants pulled back from trading amid concerns over credit exposure.

Natural gas prices, which had already been under pressure from weakening demand following the dot-com slowdown and the Sept. 11 attacks, remained volatile during the period.

US Benchmark Henry Hub prices fell from their peak of $8 to $10 per million British thermal units to an average of just $2 to $3 per MMBtu for much of 2001 and 2002.

The Great Recession:

After a volatile start to the new millennium, energy prices had a strong recovery, with Brent crude oil rallying to a record high of $147/bbl in mid-2008, according to data from Trading Economics.

This momentum, however, was short-lived, with the Great Financial Crisis of 2008 delivering one of the most severe demand shocks in modern markets, as the collapse of the global financial system triggered a sharp contraction in industrial, trade, and transportation activities.

From a record high earlier in the year, prices dropped to nearly $30/bbl to $40/bbl by December, amid unprecedented demand erosion, as daily oil consumption dropped by 1.4 million barrels between 2008 and 2009, according to EIA data.

Natural gas markets followed a similar trajectory, with Henry Hub prices dropping from nearly $13/MMBtu in June 2008 to below $4/MMBtu by August 2009.

Arab Spring

Soon after, the Arab Spring lifted the markets and prices to whole new levels. Starting in 2010, the conflict in Libya took a toll on the country's 1.6 million barrels of sweet crude output, with the risk of broader contagion embedding a sustained geopolitical premium in the markets.

The supply shock came at a time when global demand was just beginning to recover from the financial crisis, amplifying the price impact.

Brent crude prices, which averaged between $70/bbl and $80/bbl in 2010, surged well-above $100/bbl in early 2011 and remained elevated for the next 12 to 18 months.

Natural gas markets were affected more indirectly. Europe, which had exposure to North African pipeline gas, saw periodic supply concerns, while liquefied natural gas demand remained supported as countries sought to diversify supply sources amid rising geopolitical uncertainty.

Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

The Fukushima Nuclear Disaster in Japan, following the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami in March 2011, resulted in a structural shift in the global energy mix, particularly in favor of LNG.

After this disaster, Japan, which was at that time the world's third-largest LNG importer, shut down the vast majority of its nuclear fleet, which accounted for 30% of its total power supply. This was instead replaced with fossil fuels, primarily LNG.

This led to a surge in demand, with Tokyo LNG imports jumping from 70 million metric tons in 2010 to over 85 million metric tons by 2012, significantly tightening the market, according to EIA data.

Beyond the regional impact, the disaster shifted public perceptions regarding nuclear energy, leading even countries like Germany to phase out their reactors, in favor of natural gas-fired power plants dominating their energy mix.

Shale Revolution

The shale revolution wasn't an event as much as it was a structural shift in the market, which saw the US transform from a major energy importer, to one of the biggest producers of oil and gas in the world.

Driven by advances in horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing, US crude output surged from 5 million barrels per day in 2009 to over 9 mmbbl/d by 2015, with the rapid supply growth weighing heavily on global markets.

Initially, oil prices remained elevated. Brent crude traded in the $100/bbl and $110/bbl range between 2011 and mid-2014, supported by strong demand and lingering geopolitical risks.

However, by late 2014, the market tipped into oversupply, with the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries also deciding not to cut output, aiming instead to defend its market share against rising US shale output.

The result was a sharp and prolonged drop in prices, with Brent crude falling from over $100/bbl in mid-2014 to below $50 by early 2015, and eventually to around $27/bbl to $30/bbl in early 2016, according to the EIA's price data.

Covid Pandemic:

The COVID-19 pandemic delivered another unprecedented shock to global energy markets, as lockdowns, travel bans, and industrial shutdowns caused demand to collapse almost overnight.

Oil markets experienced their most extreme dislocation in modern history, with the West Texas Intermediate dropping from around $60/bbl in January 2020, to below $20/bbl in April.

In fact, on Apr. 20, 2020, the front-month WTI futures briefly traded at negative $36.98/bbl, as storage capacity filled and traders were effectively paying to offload physical crude, which was truly unprecedented in modern energy markets.

Global demand destruction was just as severe, with oil consumption falling by nearly 9 mmb/d in 2020, marking the largest annual decline on record.

The collapse resulted in a massive, coordinated policy response, with OPEC and its allies, or OPEC+, agreeing to record production cuts of nearly 9.7 mmbbl/d, starting in May 2020, stabilizing markets and helping prices recover into the $40 to $50 per barrel range by year-end.

Russia-Ukraine War

The Russian war against Ukraine in 2022 triggered a major upheaval, particularly in natural gas.

Before the war, Russia supplied between 35% to 40% of Europe's natural gas, making it the continent's dominant supplier.

However, following its unprovoked aggression against Ukraine and the sweeping Western sanctions against Russian energy exports, the markets faced significant tightening.

The sudden disruption led to extreme price volatility, with Dutch TTF prices soaring from around 20 euros ($23.37) per megawatt-hour in 2021 to 300 euros per MWh in August 2022.

Sanctions on Russian oil also reshaped crude markets, with prices rising from $70s per barrel in 2021, to as high as $120/bbl in March 2022.

However, unlike previous disruptions, sanctions did not fully remove Russian oil from global markets, but merely served to redirect it.

Russia offered crude at steep discounts to attract buyers, particularly in Asia. Its flagship Urals crude traded at discounts of up to nearly $35 against Brent, Reuters data showed.

The cheap Russian oil was eventually refined in India and other Asian countries before being supplied to key global markets, including Europe, which helped ease the tightness.

Iran Conflict

The latest structural disruption to hit the global energy markets is the ongoing military conflict in Iran, and the resulting blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, which handles 20% of global LNG flows and 25% of the world's seaborne oil trade.

Oil and gas prices witnessed a steep surge, hitting levels not seen in years, before cooling off over the past few days amid the two-week ceasefire. After jumping in the $120s in March, Brent futures are currently hovering over the $100 benchmark.

The broader consensus, however, is that this disruption is far from nearing its end, as both Iran and Israel have persisted with their attacks, while the US continues to maintain its military forces in the surrounding region.

This disruption has intensified competition for alternative supplies, with Asian buyers, who predominantly relied on Middle Eastern flows, now actively bidding for US LNG cargoes.

Related Articles

Oil & Energy

Trump Says Iran Doing 'Very Poor Job' Allowing Oil Through Hormuz, Not Honoring Agreement

Oil & Energy

Global Energy Supply Hit as Middle East Conflict Drives LNG Down 20%, Oil 13%, IMF Says

Global liquefied natural gas flows fell roughly 20% amid the Middle East conflict, while oil supply dropped about 13%, triggering a major energy shock, the International Monetary Fund said Thursday.The disruption has pushed energy prices higher worldwide, with the shock spreading across supply chains and affecting both importing and exporting economies unevenly.Brent crude rose sharply from about $72 per barrel before the conflict to around $120/bbl at its peak, reflecting tight supply conditions and heightened uncertainty, the IMF noted.Although prices have eased from highs, they remain elevated, with many countries paying premiums to secure limited oil supplies in strained global markets.Over 80% of countries are net oil importers, leaving the majority of global economies exposed to rising energy costs and supply disruptions during the shock, the IMF said.The drop in supply has also disrupted refining operations, as facilities struggle to maintain minimum throughput levels amid reduced crude availability.Shortages of refined fuels, including diesel and jet fuel, have affected transportation networks, trade flows, and tourism activity across multiple regions, according to the IMF.LNG markets have been heavily impacted, with supply constraints tightening availability and intensifying competition among buyers.Qatar's Ras Laffan complex, which accounts for about 93% of Gulf LNG output, has been largely offline since early March and may take three to five years to fully recover, the IMF added.The disruption has left Asia-Pacific markets facing acute shortages, given their heavy reliance on LNG imports from the Gulf region.Shipping flows have been affected, with tanker traffic from the Gulf disrupted for weeks, reducing availability of both crude oil and LNG cargoes, the IMF said.The shock is feeding into inflation, as higher energy costs pass through to goods and services, while supply shortages further constrain demand.The IMF stressed that policymakers should avoid unilateral actions, such as export bans or price caps, that could distort markets and intensify global supply shortages.Authorities are encouraged to adopt targeted and temporary fiscal measures to support vulnerable households while preserving longer-term fiscal discipline.Central banks should remain cautious, maintaining a focus on price stability while keeping policy steady unless inflation risks escalate, the IMF added.The IMF said that if inflation expectations rise sharply, policymakers may need to respond with interest rate increases to prevent a broader inflation cycle.Fiscal support should remain narrowly focused, avoiding broad subsidies that weaken price signals and reduce incentives to conserve energy.The IMF added that governments are advised to closely monitor evolving conditions, adjusting policies as needed while avoiding overreaction to short-term volatility.The IMF warned that global fiscal space has weakened, with public debt rising sharply over the past two decades, including across most G20 countries, increasing interest costs and highlighting the need to rebuild fiscal buffers.In tighter financial conditions, policymakers may need to balance growth risks with inflation control, requiring careful coordination between fiscal and monetary policies.Energy conservation measures, including demand reduction policies and efficiency initiatives, are being implemented in several countries to ease pressure on supply.Governments are also rolling out emergency energy-saving measures, including public conservation campaigns, limits on private vehicle use, and expanded remote work, the IMF said, citing data from the International Energy Agency.The IMF also stressed the need for strong global policy coordination, warning that conflicting fiscal and monetary policies could worsen economic instability.The IMF expects demand for balance-of-payments support to rise to between $20 billion and $50 billion due to spillovers from the Middle East conflict, with lower needs if the ceasefire holds.The fund said stronger policymaking in emerging markets has helped limit the scale of support required, adding it remains well positioned to assist its 191 member countries and coordinate responses.

Oil & Energy

Iran's Crypto-Based Hormuz Tolls Seen Generating Up to $20 Million Daily, TRM Labs Says

Iran's toll framework outlines charges of up to $2 million per vessel for transit of the Strait of Hormuz, payable in crypto or Chinese yuan, with daily revenue estimated at about $20 million, TRM Labs said in a Thursday note.Under the system, ship operators must first contact an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-linked unnamed intermediary and submit detailed vessel data, including ownership, cargo, routing, and crew information for approval.Authorities then screen vessels for links to the US or Israel, with some ships denied passage entirely.Others are categorized under a five-tier system based on "friendliness," TRM said, adding that "friendlier nations" pay lower toll charges.Additionally, payments are negotiated based on crude volumes and vessel classification, with oil tanker fees typically ranging from about $0.50 per barrel to $1/bbl, and rates varying by nationality tier.Additionally, fully laden Very Large Crude Carriers, which carry about 2 million barrels, are expected to pay about $2 million per tanker, according to TRM.For container ships and other vessel classes, charges are negotiated individually.Rates also vary by a vessel's country classification, while fees for container ships and other vessel types are determined on a case-by-case basis, according to the note.Payments must be made either in digital assets or in Chinese yuan via Kunlun Bank or through the Chinese payment network, known as CIPS or the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System, the note added.Following the payment, vessels will receive a VHF-broadcast passcode and are guided through a northern corridor near Larak Island by an IRGC naval escort.Iran's use of digital assets for transit tolls marks a notable example of cryptocurrency enabling state-level sanctions evasion, with payments routed outside traditional financial systems, TRM Labs said.Iran formalized the framework through its Strait of Hormuz Management Plan in March."At current traffic levels, public estimates suggest the toll system could generate up to $20 million per day from oil tankers alone, with $600-800 million per month possible if liquefied natural gas vessels are included," according to TRM."The unnamed intermediary administering toll collection remains publicly unidentified - a critical gap for any future enforcement or sanctions action targeting the payment network," according to TRM Labs.Crypto transactions enable faster settlement outside US banking channels, making it difficult to monitor or block payments in real time, the note added.Despite a Pakistan-brokered ceasefire taking effect on Apr. 7, tolls remain active, TRM said."Tolls remain in effect, and Iran's institutional infrastructure... suggests no near-term rollback," according to TRM.